- 1 items are tagged with professionalization
- 2 items are tagged with taxexemption
- 2 items are tagged with invisiblehand
- 1 items are tagged with advertising
- 1 items are tagged with happiness
- 1 items are tagged with Cornuelle
- 1 items are tagged with executivecompensation
- 4 items are tagged with capitalism
- 1 items are tagged with French social theory
- 1 items are tagged with charity
- 3 items are tagged with economics
- 1 items are tagged with classicalphilanthropy
- 1 items are tagged with progressivism
- 2 items are tagged with prometheus
- 1 items are tagged with associations
- 1 items are tagged with communitarianism
- 1 items are tagged with socialengineering
- 2 items are tagged with donorintent
- 1 items are tagged with selfishness
- 1 items are tagged with globalphilanthropy
- 1 items are tagged with nonprofitmanagement
- 3 items are tagged with selforganization
- 1 items are tagged with welfarestate
- 1 items are tagged with accountability
- 3 items are tagged with disasterresponse
- 2 items are tagged with democracy
- 1 items are tagged with Montesquieu
Philanthropy for Growth
Stephen Jordan at the US Chamber's Business Civic Leadership Center has a nice blog post today-- Some Modest Proposals for Generous Billionaires --that calls for philanthropy that seeks to generate new philanthropists by focusing infrastructure for wealth creation. Jordan writes:
Too often, we tend to think of philanthropy in redistributionist terms, not in terms of growth. Yes, some philanthropy should focus on immediate, humanitarian issues – people are dying today, and there are situationally urgent things that need to be taken care of. But at the same time, improvement, progress, or whatever you want to call it, depends on foresightedness too.
As more billionaires sign on to The Giving Pledge, I hope that they will invest as much in platforms for productivity and the future as they do in giving back to the present.
Unfortunately, Jordan lapses into the rhetoric of strategic collaborations, quoting Rhonda Mims from the ING Foundation--"I don't think it's necessary to create more non-profits or private foundations to solve societal issues but more important is to form collaborations focused on strategic plans to tackle big issues like education reform, global warming, financial literacy, etc."
Unfortunately, such "collaborations" --which can tend to become philanthropic cartels-- can often drive out genuine entrepreneurship in philanthropy and social action. Collaboration is a good, but not THE good. Let's hope philanthropists give competition it's due, too!
Join the Email List
Latest Comments
- Making Volunteers: Civic Life After Welfare's End
Sorry for the previous message: This is what I had meant to send: Hi, this is ... - Making Volunteers: Civic Life After Welfare's End
Hi, this is Nina Eliasoph, here, the author, and it's a little funny to write ... - Richard C. Cornuelle (1927-2011)
Nice article, thanks for the information. - The Science of Liberty: Democracy, Reason and the Laws of Nature
"The purpose of this book is clear enough: science sparked the democratic revo... - The Science of Liberty: Democracy, Reason and the Laws of Nature
Perhaps I should have titled my book "The Science of Liberty" instead of "Diap... - Education, Giving and the Quest for Faith
It's a shame there are so many barriers to entry for teaching that prevent peo...




Add comment